A winding road to a Ph.D.
There’s no ‘typical’ path through science. Gerald Young is the perfect example.
This story originally appeared on the University’s Bold Thinkers blog, which ran from May 2018 to Nov. 2019.
Gerald Young likes to think about thinking. Specifically, the San Francisco State graduate student has focused his research on rumination, the process of dwelling on the source of problems in one’s life. Yet he’s managed to keep looking forward despite a rocky road to a Ph.D. program.
Students in the sciences are often confronted with a very linear scenario of how they should advance in academia. Four years as an undergraduate, six years getting your Ph.D., three years in postdoctoral research, seven years to tenure, and then you’ve got it made. In reality, there’s no typical path.
Young is a perfect example. After two years in community college, he transferred to California State University, East Bay as a psychology major, hoping to eventually become a California highway patrolman. He ended up doing data entry as a research assistant for a professor who was impressed by his work ethic and told Young he’d be a good fit for a Ph.D. program. He was flummoxed. “My father has a bachelor’s degree but no one else in my family went to college,” he said. But after some convincing, he decided to pursue a career in research.
Bolstered by his professor’s prior encouragement, he applied to 14 Ph.D. programs… and was rejected from all of them. “I was naïve,” he explained. “I didn’t really understand the process,” especially the important role of research experience in making candidates competitive.
The next year, after retaking the GRE and unsuccessfully applying for another round of Ph.D. programs, Young landed two part-time volunteer positions in Stanford University research labs so he could gain more research experience. He also quit his full-time job at an aviation repair company so he could devote more time to research, commuting an hour and a half each way from his parent’s house in Livermore. There, he began his work on rumination, working on studies of how nature can get people to avoid dwelling on their issues. “If anything, those two years of rejection just motivated me more,” he said. “I knew I could do it. Someone just needed to give me the chance.”
That chance came when he was accepted into the masters of psychology program at SF State, where he’s studied under Professor of Psychology David Matsumoto, an expert on facial expressions and emotions and non-verbal communication such as gestures. When Young applied for Ph.D. programs a third time, his uncertainty was gone. He begins a Ph.D. program at the University of California, Berkeley in the fall.
While at SF State, he’s dug deeper into the science behind rumination. Previous studies have shown that it’s commonly experienced by those with depression. “People with depression focus on negative information about themselves. It just becomes worse and worse over time,” Young said.
Psychologists have tended to study rumination in white Americans, although emerging evidence indicates that the way a person ruminates might depend on their cultural heritage. Young’s thesis work at SF State looked at how Asian Americans experience rumination differently from European Americans. Next, he plans to further expand the scope of his research. “There’s no literature on Hispanics or African Americans,” Young said.
Even while he finishes up his thesis, Young isn’t sitting still. He continues to volunteer for the same Stanford research lab, and he works as an evaluator for the SF BUILD program, finding ways to quantify the program’s effectiveness in meeting its goal of helping underrepresented students advance in science.
Young’s path to a Ph.D. had its roadblocks, but he believes his experience outside of science made him a stronger scientist. “In my full-time job, I gained communication skills and the work ethic to handle anything that was thrown my way,” he said. And at least one lesson he learned in his scientific training came in handy for thinking about his career path, too. Good science, Young explained, is slow and methodical. “Everything is incremental. You have to take it one step at a time.”