SF BUILD scientists address health disparities at symposium

Student puts petri dish in containment fridge

San Francisco State University scientists with SF BUILD (Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity), a National Institute of Health-funded project, presented their research at the 11th Annual Health Disparities Research Symposium at the University of California, San Francisco.

Increasing the diversity of the biomedical science workforce reduces health disparities

San Francisco State University Professor of Biology Leticia Márquez-Magaña says science is facing a crisis. When it comes to chronic illnesses like diabetes and heart disease, the people with the worst outcomes — minority communities — are often left out of research profiles. “That’s bad science,” she says. The problem is further compounded when the people most interested in studying minority health are other minorities, and they’re underrepresented in the field, she said. She and other researchers are working to change this through SF BUILD (Building Infrastructure Leading to Diversity), a $17 million National Institute of Health-funded project led by SF State in partnership with University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).  The program’s mission is to increase diversity in the biomedical workforce by transforming teaching and research environments at SF State.

Photo of Anaiis Cisco and President Les Wong

Participants in the PASITO (Promoting Activity and Stress Reduction in the Outdoors) Program gather in preparation for a nature hike. As part of the program, members of SF BUILD test participants to see if nature walks lead to a reduction in stress levels.

SF BUILD scientists working in the Health Equity Research (HER) Lab at SF State presented their work at the 11th Annual Health Disparities Research Symposium at UCSF Friday, Oct. 13. The focus of the meeting was how diversifying the biomedical workforce can lead to reductions in health disparities. “Researchers from minority communities tend to have the innate trust of those communities. They have a better understanding of the cultural context, and that can improve the quality of the study and data gathered,” said Márquez-Magaña, who is the director of SF BUILD and the HER Lab.

SF State post-doctoral fellow Cathy Samayoa saw this firsthand in her research. She’s studying the biological effects of peer-administered stress reduction techniques on Latina breast cancer survivors. She had a 95 percent participation rate  and more than 90 percent retention rate from the 100 Latina breast cancer survivors she contacted for particular measures used in the study. Márquez-Magaña predicts the high rates are due to the cultural congruency between scientists and community members “Dr. Samayoa is Latina, grew up in a Latino community, and speaks Spanish. There are a lot of barriers that get broken down when you come from those communities.” Samayoa presented her preliminary findings at Friday’s symposium.

SF State post-baccalaureate researcher Edgar Josue Velazquez and graduate student Eric Johnson displayed posters at the symposium on their project, PASITO (Promoting Activity and Stress Reduction in the Outdoors). They work in collaboration with the Latina Center, a community center in Richmond, to measure how community walks and nature hikes affect the stress levels of residents. “Participants give their saliva samples and we can test for stress hormones to see if there’s a reduction after being exposed to green spaces,” Johnson said. “We try to make sure our research is tied to the health of our communities.”

Márquez-Magaña wants this type of community-health research to continue. One way is by ensuring that underrepresented minority students enrolled in biomedical science classes graduate with degrees in those majors. During the symposium, she discussed the ways SF BUILD is implementing different approaches within SF State classrooms. “We’re affirming minority students — their experiences, their values, their interests,” she said. “We are saying, ‘It’s OK to come from these backgrounds. In fact, we value it.’ That’s how we want to change the environment for science, teaching and research. And in the end, these changes are expected to increase students’ intent to remain in science.”

Last update: 
2017-11-07 16:39
By: 
JO